Prediction of Patricia Maria Tig [215th] vs Heather Watson [191st] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
L W L W L W W L W L
Form
W L L L L W W W L LHead-To-Head: Tig 2 - 0 Watson
They have played 4 sets in total, with Tig winning 4 and Watson winning 0. The last match between Tig and Watson was at the Citi Open - Washington, 01-08-2017, First, Hard with Patricia Maria Tig getting the victory 7-6(4) 7-6(3).
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Patricia Maria Tig | 2 |
Heather Watson | 0 |
Tig | Stats | Watson |
---|---|---|
65% (11-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 36% (4-7) |
2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
215 | Ranking | 191 |
56 | Highest Rank | 38 |
30 | Age | 32 |
R | Plays | R |
23 | Titles | 12 |
64% (399-222) | Career Total W/L | 55% (426-354) |
$588,976 | Career Prize Money | $2,680,534 |
0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) |
![]() ![]()
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Heather Watson
59%
(
66 of
111)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
75)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
7-6(4) 6-1 |
![]() ![]()
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Heather Watson
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 0 |
27 | Games Won | 19 |
5 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
11 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
1:44:9 | Average Match Time | 1:44:9 |
58% (103/177) | 1st Serve % | 59% (79/133) |
70% (72/103) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (56/79) |
54% (40/74) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (27/54) |
50% (6/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (4/14) |
38% (50/133) | Return Points Win % | 37% (65/177) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (3/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Patricia Maria Tig vs Heather Watson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tig 2 - 0 Watson
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tig has won 38.8% of points on their second serve, while Watson has won 38.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tig, in recent form, has won 51.79% of their opponent's second serve points, while Watson has won 49.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.47% and 32.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tig has saved 49.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Watson has saved 48.25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tig has won 76.24% of matches played (W/L 77/ 24), with Watson winning 53.66% (W/L 22/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 263/ 114), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 13% (W/L 1/ 7). Watson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 77/ 46), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 58/ 59).
- Player level: In the last year, Tig has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.09% of matches (W/L 38/ 17), where as Watson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 78.95% of matches (W/L 15/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tig winning 2 times and Watson being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Tig winning 4 and Watson winning 0. The last match between Tig and Watson was at the Citi Open - Washington, 01-08-2017, First, Hard with Patricia Maria Tig getting the victory 7-6(4) 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:9.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tig and Watson have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tig winning 0 times and Watson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Tig winning 3, and Watson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tig has played against opponents with an average rank of 164.14 while Watson has played against players with an average rank of 203.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tig has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Watson has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tig has converted 43.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Watson has converted 38.04% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Patricia Maria Tig Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Amina Anshba
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
11
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Ariana Geerlings
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Federica Urgesi
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Julieta Pareja
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Emiliana Arango
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
73%
(
99 of
136)
1st Serve %
57%
(
84 of
147)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
18
47%
(
47 of
99)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
52 of
84)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
21 of
63)
41%
(
9 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
49%
(
67 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
74 of
147)
143
Total Points Won
140
|
7-5 6-7(2) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Miriana Tona
48%
(
35 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
41 of
85)
5
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
9
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Arina Bulatova
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
29 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Heather Watson Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Heather Watson
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
34%
(
13 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Heather Watson
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Heather Watson
Player
Marina Stakusic
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Heather Watson
Player
Sara Sorribes Tormo
59%
(
59 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
49%
(
49 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Heather Watson
Player
Whitney Osuigwe
44%
(
24 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Rebecca Marino
Player
Heather Watson
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Katie Volynets
Player
Heather Watson
87%
(
60 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Maria Timofeeva
Player
Heather Watson
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Heather Watson
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Heather Watson
Player
Lola Radivojevic
75%
(
83 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
115)
11
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
7
75%
(
62 of
83)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
50 of
64)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
36 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
115)
122
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 6-7(14) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Where To Watch Tig vs Watson?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Tig Vs Watson is now available here.

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
64% (399/222) | Win/Loss | 55% (426/354) |
63% (879/518) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (973/846) |
56% (7018/5549) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8859/8179) |
0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
606 | Aces Total | 2353 |
0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
1787 | Total Double Faults | 2239 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:26:1 |
141.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 134.42 |
60% (14130/23637) | 1st Serve % | 60% (29340/48975) |
63% (8947/14130) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (19120/29340) |
46% (4350/9507) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (8821/19624) |
48% (1513/3120) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2613/5768) |
47% (10945/23261) | Return Points Win % | 44% (21524/48750) |
65% (393/603) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (421/772) |
25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
59% (73/124) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (103/205) |
51% (85/168) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (140/265) |
88% (412/363) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (408/348) |
12% (412/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (408/59) |
17% (207/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (372/77) |
Other Predictions
- Loading news...